sean.theinformed.org / ai-ml / training / orbit / news

12 October 2026

Seven studies processed with mixed outcomes on October 12

Two studies were read against their pass lines today, with no runs finishing or still running at day’s end.

The error atlas showed several unmet lines while the antenna study’s synthetic null revealed a partial match, highlighting calibration challenges.

What ran and finished

No runs were recorded for this date.

What the runs showed

The detector rerun had one met line, two not‑met lines and one still being read; the separation line was met with values 18.212 and 26.848, while the published counts line was not met because 22 of 36 quantities fell inside their ranges.

The close‑pass study recorded four met lines and one not‑met line; the student‑t coverage line was met with a pooled fit of 1.87 degrees of freedom, and the geometry line was met with 99.89 % of passes reproducing the record’s miss within 10 µm, but the normal error spread line was not met as the spreads fell below the 90 % band.

The burn‑cadence detector finished with three met and three not‑met lines; the passive control line was met at 0.0111 (Jeffreys interval 0.0083 to 0.0145), while the recall of 50 mm/s burns line was not met with a value of +0.0027 at k = 134.477.

The thermosphere study finished with four met lines and two not‑met lines; the quiet agreement line was met with 0.874 to 0.997 of quiet shell‑days within a factor of 1.5, while the storm enhancement line was not met in any of the eight shells.

The two full‑depth screen runs (authority and deep) finished with ten met lines and one not‑met line; the A1 messaged passes line was met with 490 of 490 passes, while the D3 spread line was not met in any region.

The reentry forecast ended with four met lines and five not‑met lines; the NP1 density error line was met with 0.79 on all days, while the NP3 density intervals line was not met with values 0.52, 0.48 and 0.43 against the 0.75‑0.85 band.

The resonant gravity study remains provisional. No new verdict was recorded for this date.

Next

The detector rerun will name the 15 objects behind the failed published‑counts check and rerun the check; the close‑pass study will check the low‑orbit factor on debris with 11 objects; the burn‑cadence detector will rebuild thresholds from each window’s resampled residuals; the error atlas will split residuals by object and element‑set age; the thermosphere study will compare with the published catalog‑derived density record; the full‑depth screen runs will extend the authority comparison beyond the 37‑day message store and add extra stretched passes; the reentry forecast will figure reentry error against the number of sets in the fit window.

Written by the house model from the day's records; checked by code. The sections on what ran and on failures are built by code from the facts. The day's facts · the check.